| STATE & LOCAL GOVERNANCE |
| Redistricting |
|
Experts cite redistricting, the process that effectively determines the size, shape and political composition of an electoral district, as a major reason for the lack of electoral competition in legislative and congressional races in California and other states. CGS analyzes current redistricting practices and proposed reform measures and makes recommendations for improvement. California has among the least competitive congressional and state legislative electoral districts in the nation. In 2006, only 7 of the 153 legislative and congressional races were considered competitive. For more information, please contact This e-mail address is being protected from spambots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it . A diverse coalition of nonpartisan groups including Common Cause, the League of Women Voters, and AARP hope to take redistricting power out of the hands of politicians with a redistricting initiative on the November 2008 ballot. Proposition 11, also known as California Voters FIRST, creates a 14-member independent redistricting commission responsible for drawing boundaries for the state Assembly, state Senate and the Board of Equalization. Congressional districts would still be drawn by the legislature. In 2008, the former Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez introduced ACA 1 and AB 3069, legislation that would create a "hybrid" redistricting commission consisting both of members selected by judges and by legislators. The commission would draw boundaries for the state Assembly, state Senate and the Board of Equalization, but leave Congressional districts to the legislature. A comprehensive overview comparing the major redistricting proposals facing California can be found below.
National Committee for an Effective Congress Center for Voting and Democracy Common Cause UC Berkeley Institute for Governmental Studies (IGS) Americans for Redistricting Reform
|